Advantages and Disadvantages of Democracy Essay

The marge country, the alike many other political terms, was first observe in Ancient Greece. It consists of two short words demos which federal agency every a citizen in a particular city-state or the lower differentiates, and kratos which means either rule or power but these two argon not of the same meaning. The original meaning of democracy is the rule by the poor or by the rabble. Aristotle had a clear arguwork forcet stating that a rich majority would not be able to goern fair (Arblater, 2002).This essay aims to identify advantages of modern democracy-based governments, such as equality for men and women, free push and media and absolutism as well as decl atomic number 18 whizself criticism in terms of the two systems. Democracy has become the return of various debates, with the supporters filling that it is the most appropriate form of government nowadays because it guarantees organic rights for flock.Moreover, democracy can create a positive structure for sc otch development as it provides free batch relationships amidst countries. The primary(prenominal) purposes of democracy be presented in the way of core organic rights, such as a right to vote, equality of rights for men and women, freedom of speech and facial expression and, last but not least, personal sovereignty. All these elements are c all(prenominal) for for the modern caller. For this reason, a democratic government aims to meet these requirements in order to satisfy its people.A governmental structure based on the principles of democracy, which is set up well enough in the Western countries and Europe, has been developing for more than 4 centuries and has been absorbing and leaving essential requirements, for instance constitutional rights for all citizens, for get on evolution of democracy. Today, democratic countries, for cause Great Britain, provide sovereignty to all citizens regardless of their religion, ladder or brotherly status.The main way of providin g state with the elements required for a democracy is a straight dialogue between the government and people and apprehending the latters needs and desires. (Arblaster, 2002) Furthermore, press and media is wholeness of the most important aspects of the modern democracy. However, there are still or so countries with a democratic status but with issues in this particular field. These areas are partly or only controlled by governmental agencies and authorities. The leading carriage in the non-democratic behavior is held by the Arab countries.The information released by Freedom augury in October 2010 demonstrates that the closure of the Nichane newscomposition, oneness of the most open-minded Arabic spoken communication weeklies, was another strong blow to the freedom of press in Morocco. The main reason for the closure was a systematic multi-year boycott as a result of controversial reports ab extinct the company run by the Maroc Royal family, Omnium Nord-African Group. The Fr eedom of Expression Officer at Freedom House, has accent the issue in this area by saying that Authorities are increasingly using frugal manipulation to punish and intimidate free lance or critical media.Currently, the impacts of democracy play an integral role in active preservation. Aspects such as private property, competition, and fair market which are guaranteed to the society in democratic countries today create stable scotch markets. Additionally, democracy makes trade and market relationships between countries easier in relation to communist countries, for example China, where regulations on export and import are still untold stricter (Zuzovski, 1998).After the Soviet trades union collapsed in 1991, the way Czech commonaltywealth managed to recreate from the situation in a quick and positive bearing is a great example of economical benefits in democracy-based states. The principal changes, like privatization of businesses, liquidation of monopolized external tra de and regulation of the market prices took place in Czech state between 1989 and 1992. Moreover, willingness to open the door to investments from abroad in Czech Republic led to redevelopment of industries and infrastructures in just 20 years.Thus, for example, get together States train been investing in to Czech Republic economy since 2008 and in 2011 a contribution worth $5. 41 billion was made. These investments have hepled in support of infrastructure and industry inwardly the country, and allowed the Czech Republic to become one of the strongest economics in Western Europe (U. S. Departament of State, 2012). An example like this could make a nation more faithful in democracy-based government structures.However, opponents argue that total democracy can face issues like fascism and discrimination purely because some people might think that it is in their right to divide people by race, nationality or religion. In addition, the opponents claim that an alternative political st ructure for democracy can be totalitarianism, which establishes a society with paper-based democracy but no dignity of an individual rights in practice. Totalitarianism has been cited as totally opposite system to democracy. The supporters claim that totalitarianism creates an ideally structured government and society.The philosophy of totalitarianism simply rejects the emancipation of an individual and instead substitutes it with the notion of collectivity. It only targets needs and interests of the society as a whole. However, the totalitarian regime controls private lives of people, which includes belief, tastes, and many other separate of the life. In the times of the Soviet Union, private life of all citizens was totally controlled by the governmental agencies. The rights of the people were complied, but only on paper and not in practice.However, in reality, citizens dignity was hijacked. Salient features of Soviet Union society was illusory and fictitious nature of the repres ented world. Members of some social groups had privileges, but members of other groups did not have a right to a passport, to walk on particular streets, or to use holiday resorts (Todorov, 2003). In addition, Todorov (2003) argues that the totalitarianism in post-communist Commonwealth of Independant States republics led to corrupt political institutions, and it had pl downstairsed the economy, the environment and human souls.To demonstrate decadency rate in one of post-communist countries, Holmes (2009) claims that in the first decade after collapse of the Soviet Union, the corruption rate in Russian reached 2. 7 per cent. Moreover, there have been far-flung concerns that democracy might have do workd peoples behavior towards each other. This might be based on difference and unequal sermon in terms of race, gender or ethnicity.U. S. Equal Employment fortune Commission (n. d. ) reported statistics, which claims that in the beginning of 21st century race discrimination was 36. %, however in 2011 this figure decreased for almost one per cent and became 34. 5%. Furthermore, the occurrence Benhabib (1996) suggests that the discrimination rate in the United States has decreased in the past ten years, and it works because of the positive discourse of people regardless of their gender, race, background or ethnic identity within the country. However, the core definition of democracy, which was mentioned above, sometimes cannot be used as a plain and uncompleted term. One of the problems is the relation between the idea and reality.The modern-day reality sometimes does not correspond with the idea of the classic notions of democracy. For instance, does the fact that the government is elected by the people mean that the system is a democratic one? Thus, when Hitler became the Chancellor of Germany, he did it through a constitutional process, as the leader of the Nazi party, who gained 43. 9% at Reichstag. Few people could complain about legitimacy of the German elections in 1933 but thus far not many would be able to describe the Third Reich as a democratic governor.Arblaster (2002) argues that the best remedy for this might be to retool the concept of democracy itself to suit it to real modern society. In addition, Arblaster (2002) suggests that society should not follow these mistakes, committed in the past. Moreover, Modern democracy is, in fact, capitalistic. It is rule of the capitalists. Electioneering is carried out with money. The rich candidates purchase votes. Might of economic power rules over the whole process. The net result is that we get plutocracy under the garb of democracy-democracy in name and form, plutocracy in reality.It cares a fig for the common man. The rich hold the media and use it for their own benefit. Big business houses influence dailies and use these dailies for creating public opinion to their favour. Influence of moneyed people over politics is probably clear in England, America and India. Consequently, communists dont accept it democracy at all. Socialist democracy is democracy in the right sense of the term because the welfare of the labour class and market-gardening community can be safeguarded properly only under collectivized democracy. (Tusha Jupta, 2012)In conclusion, for reasons identified and described above, democracy should be viewed as a prosperous and useful way of governing a country because it is too relatively peaceful for co-existence of individuals, society as a whole, and the government. In comparison to totalitarianism, democracy has significant positive factors, such as economic structure, easier trade relationships, constitutional rights, which in totalitarian countries are stricter and more limited. Nonetheless, it should be pointed out that democracy still has problems that need to be addressed, especially the ones in press and media sector.