Devastating Effects of Synthetic Pesticides in Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring :: Environment Environmental Pollution Preservation

Devastating Effects of synthetic substance Pesticides in Rachel Carsons Silent SpringRachel Carson was a biologist, ecologist, and a writer. She was an press for environmental awareness and published a book to help the populous understand the effects of harmful substances like DDT. Her book, Silent Spring, explained to the public the dangers of synthetic chemical substances to the environment and to the human race. She advocated that humanity should learn to coexist with the environment, not ever trying to dominate it. Her book increased environmental awareness and allowed wad to understand the delicate balance of the ecosystem. Rachel Carsons central command was base upon the fact that synthetic pesticides were destroying the delicate balance of the ecosystem. She explained that the toxic chemicals did not dissolve but instead would build up over time up the nutrition chain, eventually leading into the bodies of the upper tiers. She also used the destruction of life as a wa y to convince multitude that synthetic pesticides are bad. These specific examples of destruction, such as the death of lake fish and robins, had occurred in actually places. By linking all the occurrences of destruction, she was able to put together an argument able to change the way people think ab come forth chemical pesticides. Her argument and support made people understand that the spread of synthetic chemicals was a heavy issue.In Silent Spring, Rachel Carsons audience was not just the US government that she had been working for, but the regular people using these pesticides. She needed to reach every person and spread cognition of the serious dangers that pesticides could inflict on the environment. She simplified the specifics and scientific processes in coif for simple people to understand what these harmful chemicals were doing to them and what they were doing to the places they lived. People understood that she was physical composition not to discredit the chemical p esticide industry but to look out for everyone elses well being. The rhetorical triangle was a significant region of Silent Springs argument. Rachel Carson wanted to persuade people of the serious danger of this chemical threat. She used the appeal to emotion, or pathos, the most in her argument. She used the peoples fear in order to persuade them of the dangers. She compared the chemical pesticide to atomic fallout and she explained the concentration and build up caused by the natural food cycle. She wanted everyone to understand that they would eventually be affected by the racy concentration of toxic material.