How Personal, Organizational, and Cultural Values Affect Decision Making :: Gandhian Movement Socialization Society Essays

How Personal, Organizational, and pagan Values Affect Decision MakingSelf-limiting betrothal The Gandhian stylusI gestate mentioned two basic categories of contest regulation scholarship. In the preceding section we concerned ourselves with the first, specialists engaged in third-party intervention look for and experimentation-intermediaries, negotiation, conciliation, communication control and modification. The second involves the study of ways of waging conflict that track d cause both to keep it within bounds and to limit its intensity or at least the possibility of violence-nonviolent social movements, nonviolent resistance on the part of individuals and groups, nonviolent alternative national defense strategies. Let us look at conflict care fores that are self-regulating in nature, i.e., that have built-in devices to keep the conflict within acceptable bounds and to capture violent extremism and unbridled escalation.Socialization is an weighty determinant of the style and potence of conflict regulation in any society. If Tolley (1973) is correct in placing the shaping period for attitudinal and behavioral patterns concerning peace/ war issues and conflict regulation styles at ages 4-12, then learning creative approaches to conflict regulation through family, school, loudness media, and other primary learning environments is essential. There are a few sources dealing with this problem (Nesbitt, 1973 Abrams and Schmidt, 1972).There are societies and groups within societies that socialize their members in effective conflict regulation. Bourdieu (1962) describes Berber Kabyles of North Africa as a society held together by a process of balanced and strictly controlled conflictSelf-Limiting Conflict in which members are socialized to avoid violence Elise Boulding (1974) observes that there are certain types of family environments and child-rearing practices that tend to produce persons with nonviolent proclivities and creative response patterns to conflict. in the long run the socialization process, political socialization in particular, is probably the most important conflict regulation device. We should soon learn some interesting things close to the impact of a decade of involvement in an unpopular war on the attitudinal and behavioral patterns of Americas youth.Etzionis self-encapsulation concept is very useful here. It is a process in which certain conflicts are increasingly limited by their own nature and by the nature of the host system, so that the range of formula of the conflict is curbed. Certain modes of conflict and weapons are excluded by mutual, sometimes tacit, consent, and the conflict becomes ritualized-the game is played by the rules, so to speak. Dahrendorfs analysis of the institutionalization of labor/ steering conflict over the past half century is an excellent exercise of self encapsulation.