Social Captial: Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar and Douglas Foley :: essays research papers

For this critical analysis, the first phrase I have chosen to evaluate A Social ceiling Framework for Understanding the Socialization of Racial Minority Children and Youths by Richardo D. Stanton-Salazar. This name surprised me in various ways and gave me mixed emotions. The author detail a network-analytic framework to understand the socialization and schooling experiences of working-class racial minority youth. Stanton-Salazar examined the relationships between youth and institutional agents which plays in the greater multicultural context in which working-class minority youth must negotiate. Stanton-Salazar as well provides how students developed cultural strategies to overcome the various obstacles and how they manage to develop sustaining and corroboratory relationships with institutional agents.Right in the beginning of the article, Stanton-Salazar used a oral communication that surprised me. He referred to African American and Latino children as reinforcement in econo mically disenfranchised urban communities. I immediately thought, What is that? Its just a prettier way of sugar coating the terminology of the fairness of where children livein the ghetto For some reason, the terminology he used overthrow me. Why didnt Stanton-Salazar use vocabulary that the rest of the world is banked to exploitation instead of hiding behind his fancy college degrees? That just bothered me because in reality, there is no nice way of stating the fact and it surely doesnt help the problem in any way. Moving on, Stanton-Salazar states contemporary scholars who get word minority children and youth have tried to address the lack of vigilance to racial variations in socialization, bringing light the developmental challenges this root word faces If Im reading the statement correctly, I believe that its instead the opposite. I think that society addresses ethnicity first and foremost. The ethnicity of any minority group is the first to obtain any attention and it d escends in a downwards spiral from there. Continuing with the reading, Stanton-Salazar quotes another individual, Sennett and Cobb, the power of institutional agents lies in their competency to give or withhold knowledge which results in the institutional contend a game of whos going to be successful in society or fail. People who might withhold information may have something against a student or may think that he/she would benefit from the resource than another student. In reading this statement, it got me thinking just about when I was a student in high school. Long accounting short, I had teachers and counselors hold back information from me that would have been useful to me now.