Disadvantage of democracy Essay

The primary disadvantages of state be a world-wide wish of accountability, the prospect of personal interest becoming the predominant doer in decisions, and negative pecuniary implications. A democracy lays the power to give away decisions in the hands of the majority. This, ironically, places an emphasis on both individual and convention power. A group realises the decision-making process, put upd an influential individual bed control the group. The issue with democracy, in spite of the power of the batch to control the decision-making process, is that in that location is no virtuoso of accountability when the group makes a decision that turns come on to be a problematic unmatched.Even particularly influential individuals in the group who whitethorn digest persuaded the majority to vote for what led to the bad decision is free from blame because, ultimately, invariablyyone in the group is responsible for his or her choice. In this way democracy, although a group- oriented approach, can become very such(prenominal) about what individuals believe is best for themselves and non for the majority. This type of decision-making also can be very expensive and energise negative financial implications. First, a considerable amount of money can be spent in persuading voters to support an idea or cause. Second, voters whitethorn embrace an idea or cause, such as lowering taxes, because it sounds ideal when, in practice, it could lead to financial disaster. Disadvantages of DemocracyMaking the wrong choiceIn a antiauthoritarian field, it is the common man who has the supreme right to choose their legislature and their prevail authorities. As per a general study, not all the people be completely conscious of the political circumstances in their farming. The common rabble may not be acquainted of the political matters in their society. This may lead to common man taking an erroneous selection during election. g everywherenance May Lose focusAs the government is bound to changes and alteration afterwards each election tenure, the authorities may function with a interim objective. Since they meet to go through an election procedure after the conclusion of each tenure, they may lose focus on process effectively for the citizens andinstead might concentrate on winning elections.Hordes see InfluenceA further disadvantage of democracy is that hordes can manipu fresh citizens. People may vote in support of a society under the pressure of the bulk. Constrained or influenced by the ideas of those around, an individual may not put across his/her accurate judgment.Democracy averts radicalism and encourages teamwork and synchronization. It also slows things down, stop those in authority doing what they wish regardless of the majoritys desires. Since the soldiery incursion into the Nigerian political scene on January 15, 1966, all the woes of this country atomic number 18 placed on the army. Most Nigerians do not deficiency t o hear the word phalanx. They see the armed forces as similar with evil. But does the soldiery symbolize evil? Colonel Muamma Gaddafi is a legions military officer who seized power from the Libyan Monarch in 1969. Colonel Muamma Gaddafi as a military attraction, was able to transform Libya to the envy of the world so much that another(prenominal)(prenominal) nationals including Nigerians argon queuing at the Libyan embassy for her visa.Under a military leading in Libya, Nigerians ar rushing to the country on a day-after-day basis because the country has a lower inflation of 1% than that of Nigeria which is 20% and a per capita of $8,400 while Nigerias per capital is $50. If military politics is identical with evil, why are Nigerians running from a country that is under well-be switchd rule to a country which is under a military leader? Ghana, our neighbouring West African country was also transformed from a misdirect and poverty stricken nation it was, to a transparen t and an accountable nation by a military officer, Flight lieutenant, John Jerry Rawlings. At the moment, Nigerians are running to live in Ghana because the country has improved staggeringly in terms of economy and infrastructural development.Ghana has also attained republican growth and stability having transited from one democratically elected government to another two times. However, let us immediately compare and contrast the balance between military and urbane rules in Nigeria. Nigeria gained independence from Britain on October 1, 1960. give away of the 50 days of Nigerias existence as an independentnation, the military has ruled the country for 29 years. Within the 29 years the military ruled the country, 3 years were used to prosecute the Nigerian civilianian war, between 1967 to 1970, this means the military actually spent 26 years to rule the country. Out of the 50 years of the nations existence, noncombatants have ruled for 21 years. So, the difference between t he years the military have ruled the country and those of civilians nine years. The questions one is asking are, if the military has destruct the country inwardly the space of 29 years as claimed by the civil leading, cant the civil leaders counterbalance it within a space of 21 years?How long does it take to repair what is damaged? What has the civilian leaders be able to remedy since they have been ruling the country? Since Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999, we are still auditory modality the same old song by politicians, You know the military have undone the country and you know that it is not easy to repair what has been unmake. I find this excuse unacceptable to the Nigerian people because something that was destroyed can be repaired. For instance, Germany, France, Austria etc were devastated during the first and second World War but like a shot they have rebuilt to enviable status. Of all the things the military destroyed, which of them has the civilian leaders bee n able to put right? Some politicians who are out to fail the poor masses will say that the worst civilian politics is better than military regime.But is it always true that the worst civilian regime is better than military regime? Politicians are also spry to say that at least we can twaddle now that we are in a civilian regime and that we could not talk during the military administrations. I found this argument very amusing because our mouths were not muzzled by the military during their administrations. I make bold to say that we spoke more(prenominal) during the military administrations than we do today because then we all saw the military as our common enemy and were united to fight against them. There were so many civil society organizations such as subject area classless Coalition (NADECO) which was headed by late Pa Adekunle Ajasin, Campaign for Democracy headed by late Dr. Beko Ransom Kuti, Civil Liberties Organization headed by former electric chair of Nigerian Bar Association ( NBA ), Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), Afenifere, the Yoruba socio- cultural group headed by late Pa Abraham Adesanya, Association of Senior Staff Union of Universities, headed by the INEC Chairman, prof Atahiru Jega, Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN ), headed by Chief Frank Ovie Kokori etc.These civil society groups spoke openly against the ills of the military and sent them back to the barracks. At that time too, journalists engaged in revolutionary journalism which made the press very vibrant and added trend to the voice of the masses. During the military era, television and tuner stations were mostly owned by both states and the federal governments. DAAR communications, owner of African Independent picture and Ray power Radio station and Minaj television and FM radio station which started in 1994 were the only privately owned broadcast organizations in the country, the rest belonged to both the states and federal governments. Would the governments have allowed the masses to use their media to knock them? There is no government that allows such a thing in any part of the world. allow us assume that we did not talk during military administrations, what have we achieved since 1999 that we have been talking? piss those who claimed to be representing us both in the State provides of Assembly and the National Assembly ever taken our advise?We said the National Assembly should pass the liberty of Information Bill into law, have they done it since it was introduced into the house? We said the nicety Mohammed Uwais recommendations on Electoral Reform be adopted by the National Assembly, have they adopted them? The Federal Government has earmarked 6.6 billion towards the jubilation of Nigerias 50th anniversary, which the masses condemned in totality, yet the Federal Government is bend on wasting such amount of money on the celebration of failure. Will the States and Federal Governments ever listen to the masses ? We said the huge security deposits our so call representatives are receiving should be reduced, did they agree to reduce their allowances? A senator receives 45 million allowance quarterly, while each member of the House of Representatives receives 27.2 million allowance quarterly. Each senator receives 500 million constituency development allowance yearly which is not accounted for.Their salaries and other benefits are not included these allowances. Is in that location justification for such huge allowances considering the fact that they sit for 180 days in a year? Can we say with a sense of pride that the lives of Nigerians have improved positively since we returned to democracy in 1999? Let me make it clear that democracy is not just about having immunity to talk, it goes beyond mere talking. Democracy is about quality leadership that translatesinto speed development and growth in all areas of human aspirations. Democracy goes beyond just having civilians in government. An y administration, be it military or civil government that cannot better or improve the lives of the people is a massive failure. The main purpose of governance is to coordinate and harness the wealth of the people for an effective development that will enhance the standard of living of the people.Have we seen such achievements and development since 1999? Let us compare and contrast civil administrations since 1999 till date and military administrations from 1985 till 1999 when the military handed over the reins of power to civilians. We shall start this comparison with the economy. Before the civilians took over government in 1999, a 50 kg bag of rice was sold for N2,500, today it is selling for N8,000. A small bag of beans that was sold for N1,800, now sells for as much as N7,000. Is this not outrageous. Before the commencement of the Obasanjos regime in 1999, Nigerians were able to eat twice daily. Morning and night, which was popularly called one zero-one. At present, most Niger ians eat once daily, which is popularly called zero one- zero.Is this not regression? If the agricultural sector is well funded and productive, why are prices of foodstuffs on the increase? The unemployment rate has gone up drastically because many industries are closing down while some are relocating to our neighbouring countries due to lack of regular supply of electrical energy. The Obasanjos regime in 1999, inherited 3,500 megawatts of electricity from the military, today it has reduced to a mere 2,500 megawatts for a population of one hundred fifty million people. The problems of industries and other organizations that consume large quantity of electricity are compounded as a result of the high comprise of fossil oil products such as petrol and diesel. These products are used to power generators which provide alternative power for industries. As at the time Nigeria return to democracy in 1999, the prices of petroleum product were cheap. But before ex-president Olusegun Obas anjo, who also twofold as petroleum minister, left office in 2007, he had change magnitude the prices of these products eleven times. A litre of kerosene that cost N9.00 in 1999, now sells for N125.00. Petrol that cost N11.00 at that time, now goes for N65.00 while diesel that cost N10.00 then now sells for N120 per litre.